8D.wiki

Vacuum Void in Injection Molding — Root Cause & 8D

8D.wiki Editorial — Drafted with AI assistance, then reviewed, edited and formatted by the founder — facts, numbers, tables and terminology are checked before publication.
Reviewed & edited by: Alvin Jin — IATF 16949 expert · Certified Product Engineering (PE) coach · DRBFM expert
Published 2024-03-16 ·  Last reviewed 2026-10-25

Eliminate internal voids in injection molded parts. Packing pressure, gate design, gas venting and material shrinkage analysis with 5-Why root cause and corr...

Symptoms

  • Internal cavity visible on X-ray or cross-section — round, smooth-walled void at thickest section
  • Void located at thickest section of part (boss, rib junction, gate-remote thick wall)
  • Part weight variation correlating with void size (void reduces weight 0.2–2%)
  • Cosmetic sink mark on surface opposite an internal void

Affected Components

  • Injection molded housings, gears, brackets with thick-wall sections (> 4 mm)
  • Bosses and rib junctions where material accumulates
  • POM, PA, PBT, PP grades with high crystallinity and high volumetric shrinkage
  • Parts with long flow length from gate to the thick section

Detection Methods

  • X-ray / CT: round internal cavity with smooth walls (vs. gas traps: irregular, near-surface)
  • Cross-section / microtome: locate void and measure depth below surface
  • Part weight: compare against baseline; void reduces weight 0.2–2%
  • Warpage / differential shrinkage check: indicator of uneven cooling

Possible Causes

  • Packing pressure too low or hold time too short for the thick section
  • Gate freeze-off before the thick section is fully packed
  • Gate land too long / gate too small → premature freezing
  • High volumetric shrinkage from high-crystallinity material
  • Uneven cooling causing differential shrinkage and internal cavitation
  • Nozzle / sprue / runner freeze before cavity completion

5-Why Example

Problem: 3 mm internal void in an 8 mm thick PA66 boss

  1. Why void? → Boss not fully packed before gate froze
  2. Why not packed? → Packing ended (gate sealed) while boss was still shrinking
  3. Why sealed early? → Gate land length increased 2 mm during mold repair
  4. Why changed? → Mold repair restored an older gate design without a packing study
  5. Why not validated? → Mold repair process has no gate verification step

TRC: No gate verification step in the mold repair process MRC: Tooling change control does not require a packing/flow validation

Fishbone (6M)

  • Man: Operator delayed adjusting hold pressure after SPC alarm
  • Machine: Packing pressure drift; gate wear
  • Method: Hold time set on a gate-seal basis, not thick-section packing time
  • Material: High-shrinkage POM/PA grade; lot-to-lot MFI variation
  • Measurement: No CT/X-ray sampling; weight-check tolerance too loose
  • Environment: Mold temperature difference across cavity

D3 Containment

  • 100% X-ray/CT sampling on suspect lots; block parts with void > 0.5 mm
  • Interim: increase hold pressure 20%, extend hold time +3 s
  • Audit gate/process data on the affected tool

D5 Permanent Fix

  • Restore gate land to original dimension
  • Run a packing study to set optimum hold pressure / hold time per cavity
  • Balance shrinkage vs. sink: validate with X-ray-sampled mold trial

D7 Prevention

  • Add gate-dimension check (land length, size) to mold PM and repair sign-off
  • Add packing-pressure SPC with reaction rule
  • Update process FMEA: add “premature gate freeze-off” failure mode
  • Require a packing study on any mold repair affecting gate design

Turn this method into a submittable 8D report

Generate a D0–D8 report skeleton with a 5-Why chain and containment actions.

Open the 8D workspace →   Free Excel template

Related articles

8D.wiki — Quality Engineering Knowledge Base